Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Is America Losing Its Religion

A couple of weeks ago, this story caused quite a stir in the local blogosphere. At the time I wanted to write something on it, but decided to hold off until I had more time to really do it justice. I’m not sure if that time is now, but I decided to go ahead and tackle the issue anyway.

The story deals with a recent survey that found that 15% of American’s claim no religion, Baptists fell from 19.3% in 1990 to 15.8%, those who refer to themselves as Christian, Protestant, non-denominational, evangelical, and/or “born again” held steady at 14.2%, Jews fell from 1.8% to 1.2%, and the number of people who identify themselves as part of one of the new religious movements (Wiccan, pagan, “Spiritualist,” etc.) has reached 2.8 million.

Money Quote –

Kosmin concluded from the 1990 data that many saw God as a "personal hobby," and that the USA is "a greenhouse for spiritual sprouts."

Today, he says, "religion has become more like a fashion statement, not a deep personal commitment for many."

The local reactions seemed to start with the post hark! good news: religion less popular by Peace Arena. Rena’s stance was that this is a good sign stating “I think religion is mostly a negative influence on society.”

Fried Green Onions responded with the post Our local peacenik drives his point home with an (authoritative study?) from the HUFF Post via a tiny tiny global studies liberal college in lala land. The crux of Jim’s response was to discount the survey stating that it was a “shaky study from a tiny college.” He then went on a rant about Marxism, Evolution, neo-Darwinism, and Sociobiology, which I admittedly had a hard time following. I will try re-reading it later.

JMBZine.com then followed with the post Is religion less popular or is something else going on?. Of all of the local posts on the subject, J.M.’s was the most in-depth. Here is a section of the post that I found to be very thoughtful and pretty spot on –
Second, I think many people within the category of “none” actually are very spiritual, even if not religious. During my time in the liberal mecca of Austin, I encountered many people who were critical of religion and didn’t consider themselves religious (it seemed to be the majority viewpoint of the UT campus population and the Austin activist community), yet were deeply spiritual. Some found beliefs in other religious traditions (picking and choosing what felt right to them — which by the way, I think is a-ok). Others took more free form paths, or even just had a deep and abiding faith in the power of collective humanity.

I think all of these things, while not “religious,” are spiritual in nature. A belief in a power higher than oneself, a belief in the connectedness of all existence, a belief that consciousness may continue in some way after a death, a belief that there is more to existence than that experienced through our senses . . . I think all of these things are a kind of spiritual belief.

I know that there are many who are truly atheists (which is also ok in my book… as a believer in God, I tend to think God loves everyone and believes in everyone. God doesn’t “need” our love to be able to love and care for us. And since I’m a heretic and don’t believe in hell, I don’t think atheists, infidels or anyone is going to be tormented in the afterlife), but I think most who describe themselves as atheists or agnostics, are still spiritual even though they reject religion.

Local blogs were obviously not the only ones to chime in on this subject. Classically Liberal chimed in with the post The post-Christian shift in America continues and the Faith & Reason section of USA Today offered up the post What’s your religious ‘path?’ Any? Many? or None?. CLS started his post with the following, which I found very interesting –

For several years I have been claiming that the United States is entering a post-Christian stage of intellectual development, something I consider to be a positive trend. I argued that this trend was part of a wider trend toward more social liberalism in generally, another thing which I consider to be generally positive. Last year I wrote: “Americans are moving rapidly and quickly toward social liberalism… The American people got tired of the culture wars and they seem to be abandoning the cultural conservatives.” All this is part of our country “moving toward a post-Christian culture.”
The Faith & Reason post ended with something also worth quoting –
Eighteen years later, the new ARIS appears to prove them right. Americans are more disengaged from traditional religious denominations and Judeo-Christian ideas about God than ever before. And yet, the language of political persuasion used by the conservative right and progressive left is still steeped in Biblical morality and ethics.

Do you think the trends of the last generation will continue in the next? Which "path" will you be on? Will it be the same one as your parents or your children?
Overall I think that this survey shows the growing diversity in the United States and to me that is far from a bad thing. While I completely disagree with Rena and do not believe that “religion is mostly a negative influence on society” I do understand and empathize with where many of the non-believers are coming from. While the USA’s religious framework is changing the fact remains that the majority of American’s (especially those in power) are Christian and for those of non-Christian religious beliefs, the landscape can feel daunting. The problem that I think many non-believers have with organized religion has more to do with the organization and the organization(s) need to hold on to power than it does with actual faith or spirituality.

To me all religions offer a path to heaven, enlightenment, paradise, or whatever you want to call it. We spend too much time debating the minutia differences instead of focusing on the holistic similarities. Faith and spirituality is something that can unite us, if we don’t let religion get in the way.

Keep that Change

I just got back from the bank where I traded in a jar full of change and got back a little over $40. Every night for the past few months I would take the change in my pocket and put it in a jar to save up. This is something that we have done in the past, but normally I end up pilfering the spoils to get things that we need at times of extreme broke-ness, but this time I made a concerted effort to not touch the change and it seems to have paid off.

Now I know that the term change has gotten a bad rap lately, but I think that this is change that we can all believe in.

CD Reviews

evangelicals
Artist: Evangelicals
Album: The Evening Descends
Label: Dead Oceans, Inc.

The Evangelicals play spacey indie pop that sounds like it was made by some guys who grew up in the shadow of The Flaming Lips (and that is not a bad thing). This CD received rave reviews from the folks at Guestroom Records and I can definitely see why. The music is good and challenging all at the same time. Overall this is not something that I am going to listen to all of the time, but it is good and worth checking out.

rem
Artist: R.E.M.
Album: Accelerate
Label: Warner Bros. Records

I haven’t purchased a new R.E.M. record in probably 10 years, but for some reason I decided to pick up their latest album Accelerate and boy am I glad that I did. This album isn’t Document or Automatic for the People or anything, but it is probably the best thing the band has done since Monster and easily the best thing they have done since Bill Berry left the band. The music on Accelerate is full of energy and passion, which has been lacking from most of R.E.M.’s material for quite a few years now.

rise against
Artist: Rise Against
Album: Appeal to Reason
Label: DGC / Interscope Records

I picked up this CD for two reasons – 1) it was on sale for $7.99 and 2) Zach Blair of Hagfish and Armstrong fame plays guitar. My first impression of this CD was that it is not good. The lead singer’s voice is fairly annoying and atypical for modern emo and alt rock. In other words, this sounds like the same generic nonsense that you’d hear on radio stations like The Buzz. There are a few songs that make the CD not a complete waste (“The Dirt Whispered,” “Kotov Syndrome,” “Audience of One,” and “Entertainment,” the first of these by far being the stand out track on the album). Overall I’d suggest avoiding this CD (which I hate saying considering how much I love Blair’s other work).

street dogs
Artist: Street Dogs
Album: State of Grace
Label: Hellcat Records

The Street Dogs’ fourth album State of Grace picks up where Fading American Dream leaves off and is pretty much what you’d expect from the band of the former lead singer of the Dropkick Murphys. State of Grace also shows hints of influences on the band outside of punk rock, but the albums fails to reach the loft expectations that were set in the original press release that claimed the one would hear a variety of influences on this album. Don’t get me wrong, this is a very good CD, I just went into it expecting a bit more variety than I got, but then again the Street Dogs do this thing pretty darn well, so why mess with a good thing.

vivian girls
Artist: Vivian Girls
Album: Vivian Girls
Label: In The Red Records

The Vivian Girls play low-fi indie rock that is reminiscent of Bratmobile and Bikini Kill with a little bit of Jesus & Mary Chain thrown in for good measure. There is also a good dose of 60’s pop influence in the band’s music as well (I can’t tell if it is a direct or indirect influence…not that it matters really). The songs are short, catchy, and poppy but I can’t help wondering if they would sound a tab better if the production weren’t so low-fi. Overall this is an enjoyable CD and probably worth the hype that it is receiving.

De-baptism?

According to this story “more than 100,000 Britons have recently downloaded "certificates of de-baptism" from the Internet to renounce their Christian faith.”

From the story –
The initiative launched by a group called the National Secular Society (NSS) follows atheist campaigns here and elsewhere, including a London bus poster which triggered protests by proclaiming "There's probably no God."

"We now produce a certificate on parchment and we have sold 1,500 units at three pounds (4.35 dollars, 3.20 euros) a pop," said NSS president Terry Sanderson, 58.

John Hunt, a 58-year-old from London and one of the first to try to be "de-baptised," held that he was too young to make any decision when he was christened at five months old.

The male nurse said he approached the Church of England to ask it to remove his name. "They said they had sought legal advice and that I should place an announcement in the London Gazette," said Hunt, referring to one of the official journals of record of the British government.

So that's what he did -- his notice of renouncement was published in the Gazette in May 2008 and other Britons have followed suit.


The Church of England has responded stating “its official position was not to amend its records. "Renouncing baptism is a matter between the individual and God," a Church spokesman told AFP.” The spokesman went on to say "We are not a 'membership' church, and do not keep a running total of the number of baptised people in the Church of England, and such totals do not feature in the statistics that we regularly publish.”

Apparently this “legal battle” has spread to other countries. In fact in Spain “the high court ruled in favour of a man from Valencia, Manuel Blat, saying that under data protection laws he could have the record of his baptism erased.” And that is not the only example according to the story.

Color me crazy, but this just seems silly to me. I can understand someone not wanting their name in the records or lists of certain organizations, but this is taking it a bit far IMO. I think that the spokesman from the Church of England hit the nail on the head when he said that this was an issue between the individual and God.

What I find interesting about passionate atheists is that they are not all that different from passionate evangelical Christians. Both sides believe that they are right and cannot fathom the idea that they could be wrong and both sides see the other as fools. They attack each other with such vitriol that I truly believe that neither seems to understand the teachings that they believe is the true way (i.e. the words of Jesus and humanist philosophers, not that humanists are atheists mind you, but often atheists site humanist philosophers/philosophy). On the flip side, if someone wants to spend the money to get a “de-baptism” certificate or take a church to court then more power to ya. I just think it is a silly waste of time and money.

Oklahoma Policy Institute launches the OK Policy Blog

Join the conversation here.

From the press release –
The OK Policy blog will be a place where we can communicate more frequently and informally with Oklahomans about policy issues. We can inform you about things happening at the Capitol on a real-time basis and we can engage our audience in a more inclusive discussion.We hope that this blog will be another way to provide you with accurate, timely, and credible information almost daily. With this blog, our goals are to:
  • Post original research. The blog will allow us to release shorter, timelier pieces on emerging issues. This may be a single chart or graph on state revenue collections or a brief analysis of a bill;
  • Refer you to interesting and worthwhile analysis, news, and commentary. When a national organization publishes a report on the state fiscal crisis, the Census Bureau releases new data, or the state editorial boards print something especially insightful or controversial, we'll help guide you there. The emphasis will be on Oklahoma and on stories in our core areas - budget and taxes, public programs affecting the poor, and economic opportunity;
  • Provide information about OK Policy. We'll let you know on the blog when we've put out new issue briefs, fact sheets, and articles, or when our work has been published or cited elsewhere; and
  • Share our opinions and perspectives. We will continuously provide accurate information while sharing our findings and thoughts on the policy areas we cover.
I've been receiving the Oklahoma Policy Institute's email updates for a while now and I think that they are doing some great work and this blog will be worth checking out.


My Rotating Top 20

Whenever I talk about music and people ask me who my favorite bands/artists are there is a groups of bands that always make the Top 10 but then there are others that depending on the day may not make the Top 10, but still live in the Top 20. I’ve come to think of these bands and these lists as my Rotating Top 20 Bands of All Time. The positions may change depending on my mood, but these bands are pretty much always there, somewhere.

My Rotating Top 20 (in no particular order) –
ALL / Descendents
U2
R.E.M.
Dropkick Murphys
Swingin’ Utters
Buffalo Tom
The Replacements
Dag Nasty
The GC5
The Staggers
The Roustabouts
7 Seconds
Hagfish
One Man Army / Dead To Me
The Donnas
The Methadones
Johnny Cash
The Eyeliners
The Bouncing Souls
The Blues Brothers


The Rotating Honorable Mentions
Teenage Frames
Rilo Kiley
Guided By Voices
Sebadoh
Superchunk
The Epoxies
Sugar
The Pavers
Screeching Weasel
The Riverdales
Dinosaur Jr.
The Pixies
The Devil Dogs
Sam & Dave
Wilson Picket
Otis Redding
The Mighty Mighty Bosstones
Peter, Paul, & Mary
The Ducky Boys
Street Dogs
Rancid
Operation Ivy
Tina Turner
Husker Du
Cock Sparrer
Queen
Spinal Tap
Cheap Trick
Boston
The Who
The Rolling Stones

R.I.P. Lorne

Angel TV series star Andy Hallett passed away on Sunday March 29th, losing a five-year battle with heart disease. Hallett was 33.

My thoughts and prayers are with Hallett’s family and friends in this difficult time. I always loved his portrayal of the singing, green skinned demon Lorne on Angel and thought that he had tons of potential. Rest well Andy.

Monday, March 30, 2009

Separation of Church and State vs. Censorship of God from the Mouths of Individual Officials

The following was written by my friend’s husband. I do not agree with everything he has written but I thought that it was a good piece and worthy of discussion. My analysis will follow.


Separation of Church and State vs. Censorship of God from the Mouths of Individual Officials

By James F. Baine 3/27/2009

The failure of Old Testament Theocracy began when the people of Israel rebelled against their Jehovah centered culture and pursued other gods. Then Israel went into Anarchy (Judges 17-21). Eventually the culture got sick and tired of the chaos and cried out for a king. (1 Samuel 8). Yet they still refused to submit to God and desired a king so that they would be like other nations. Under the Theocracy of Samuel there were many that served as judges over Israel, a "council of Elders." But Samuel was getting older and his sons were rebellious, thus the cry for a king began. Samuel wasn't happy with the idea of a king, just one person judging all the people. They were warned of high taxes, and enslavement to the king’s whim. They did not care; they wanted a king to take care of them. They cried, begged and pleaded for a king so they could be just everybody else.

A modern day prophet that I know confirmed what I believed the Lord spoke to me. The United States of America has cried for a king. I have challenged those who voted and why they voted for their guy. Several did not know all the issues and had no understanding of our government's system of checks and balances as well our history. I have no problems with those who can explain to me the details even if I disagree. It’s the voluntary ignorance and lack of interest in our citizens of our Democracy and its history. One lady was upset and angry when I placed the blame of our governmental failures upon the Courts, Congress and not just on the president. She wanted a King. "Oh rescue me. Take Care of Me." Get me Democrat JFK even with extra-marital affairs like King David who inspired the nation

"Ask not what your country can do for you but ask what you can do for your country."

Why is it those who seek for a king will approve whatever he does but a God-seeker who takes the same actions gets labeled as a misfit. The hypocrisy runs deep.

Now onto the central theme.

First understand the USA is not a theocratic nation but most founding Fathers were either Christians or deists who embraced Judeo Christian ideals. Since not everyone was in agreement about the system, democracy was the closest and best choice for accountability to the people.

Do theocratic style nations exist today? Yes and they are mostly Islamic who believe in freedom of religion as long as it’s their own or you may lose wealth, health, family and your life. Doesn't this make you gladder you are living in America?

Now lets go back about 600 years ago at the beginning of the Reformation Period- the struggle between those who wanted reform the Catholic Church and the Reformers ( Protestants) in the Church. Martin Luther had no desire to separate from the Church but to reform its false teachings from the inside out. The Church had control of World Powers by holding the power of determining whether or not one could go to heaven. The Catholic Church was so controlling that they controlled the state and its leaders by religion. Guys like William Tyndale died at the Catholic burning stake for translating the Bible into common language of the people by the decree of the Church with the participating authorization of the State. Sound like something else in the Bible?

Today the concept of Separation of Church and State has evolved into a godless government; William Tyndale from the Reformation Period (1500's AD) recognized the State and the Church were separate governmental bodies appointed by God. In the Declaration of Independence,

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights...”

If the forefathers actually intended for Separation of Church and State then surely they did not intend that ministers leave their religious and spiritual convictions at the door where the Constitution was being signed. The First Amendment reads,

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

It seems rather simple to me. Congress cannot show favor to one religion over another nor interfere with their practice. If all religions receive some government funding for faith based programs that work better than what bureaucracy can do, then does it not make sense as long as the Feds do not forget the government is for the people and by the people?

All the points of the First Amendment are interdependent and cannot be separated. If someone wants to be an atheist, as an American, I will defend his right to be so but as a Christian I will not defend atheism. Thus I just might win more credibility as a human being who is welcoming, caring and compassionate, yet uncompromising in my faith. The government may not establish religion but it is unconstitutional to demand any citizen, civilian, government official, student, teacher, soldiers etc... ANY US CITIZEN to remain silent and leave their religion at home and at their place of worship. Its one thing to be so self righteous that other people's rights are violated even in the name of Separation of Church and State or in Jesus Christ name. God forbid anyone from trying to stop sincere people committed to their faith (Sarah Palin, a non-denominational Christian, Mike Huckabee, a Baptist, or Mick Romney, a Mormon) from running for Public office. Too many of our founding Fathers would be disqualified from office if religion was a considerable qualification for public office. Some cry "Separation of Church and State" for the sake of removing God-consciousness from the United States of America. Others may hold this "Separation of Church and State” in the light of Freedom from the tyranny of false prophets who seek to control the masses, thus taking the name of God in vain and for themselves alone.

If anything we must conclude as the martyr William Tyndale did, that the church and the state should be governed separately yet both are appointed by God which is in agreement with the Apostle St. Paul. If the Church and State are separate and God appoints leaders for both then it is reasonable by spiritual and constitutional conviction that individuals in their government positions have the right to refer to their Divinity while not forcing anyone to agree with them. Respectfully disagree…be a good citizen enforce your rights while protecting the rights of others to believe and represent what they want as long as it doesn't harm others or violate your conscience, even if they are wrong. Christians can improve their witness for Christ this way as I have with an atheist friend who has defended me as a Christian.

My thoughts –
1) The paragraph that begins “First understand the USA is not a theocratic nation…” Mr. Baine is correct in his statement that the Founding Fathers were either deists or Christians, but I would add that they no only “embraced Judeo Christian ideals” but they also embraced the ideals of the Enlightenment. This paragraph ends with “Since not everyone was in agreement about the system, democracy was the closest and best choice for accountability to the people.” This is not entirely accurate. The Founders distrusted true democracy and thus built a republic, not a democracy, technically speaking.

2) The paragraph that begins “Now lets go back about 600 years ago at the beginning of the Reformation Period…” I think we can all agree that the Roman Catholic Church had way too much power prior to the Reformation (and even for many years after as well).

3) “Today the concept of Separation of Church and State has evolved into a godless government…” Shouldn’t the government be godless? In a multi-cultural society, our government, as a body and institution, should in no way support one religion over another.

4) “If the forefathers actually intended for Separation of Church and State then surely they did not intend that ministers leave their religious and spiritual convictions at the door…” Based on everything that I have read about the issue of the Separation of Church and State, the intention was to make sure that there is no state run or sponsored religion(s). Many times people quote the Declaration of Independence line about the Creator and use that to try and prove that Thomas Jefferson was a devout Christian. While he was a devout believer in God, he was not what one would call a devout Christian. In fact, he and James Madison were responsible for the first law protecting religious freedom in Virginia (which is still on the books and was the blueprint for the separation in the federal government). That having been said, Mr. Baine is correct that the protections were not intended to stop an individual from holding religious convictions while in public office.

5) “It seems rather simple to me. Congress cannot show favor to one religion over another nor interfere with their practice. If all religions receive some government funding for faith based programs that work better than what bureaucracy can do, then does it not make sense as long as the Feds do not forget the government is for the people and by the people?” I agree with this. If there is an all or nothing policy (i.e. all religions get it or none of them do, or at least all that apply).

6) “The government may not establish religion but it is unconstitutional to demand any citizen, civilian, government official, student, teacher, soldiers etc... ANY US CITIZEN to remain silent and leave their religion at home and at their place of worship. Its one thing to be so self righteous that other people's rights are violated even in the name of Separation of Church and State or in Jesus Christ name.” I agree, to a point. When individuals are acting as individuals and not representing some part of the government, then by all means they can express whatever they want. The problem creeps in when said individuals are working in an official capacity and their actions are representing the government. For example, it would be fine for a teacher to lead a voluntary prayer after school, but it would be improper for a teacher to lead a mandatory prayer during school hours and on campus. The key differences are the voluntary nature of participation and the setting. In other words, there is a time and a place for everything.

7) “God forbid anyone from trying to stop sincere people committed to their faith (Sarah Palin, a non-denominational Christian, Mike Huckabee, a Baptist, or Mick Romney, a Mormon) from running for Public office. Too many of our founding Fathers would be disqualified from office if religion was a considerable qualification for public office.” There is actually a clause in the Constitution that protects against any kinds of religious test. I also have no problems with the aforementioned people and others like them running for office. It does scare me when some of the things that they offer in their platforms gets too close and cozy with theocracy (for example, so of the things that Huckabee supported were a bit too close to supporting a theocracy for me).

8) “Some cry "Separation of Church and State" for the sake of removing God-consciousness from the United States of America. Others may hold this "Separation of Church and State” in the light of Freedom from the tyranny of false prophets who seek to control the masses, thus taking the name of God in vain and for themselves alone.” I think both cases listed here are perversions of the true intentions of the Separation of Church and State.

9) “…be a good citizen enforce your rights while protecting the rights of others to believe and represent what they want as long as it doesn't harm others or violate your conscience, even if they are wrong…” I agree 100%.

Overall I think that this is a very thoughtful piece by someone who is passionate about his believes and able to express them quite well. Thoughts?

Currently Listening

1. “Tangerine” by Buffalo Tom (from Sleepy Eyed)
2. “What’s Wrong” by Dead To Me (from Little Brother)
3. “Argos” by Bob Mould (from Life and Times)
4. “Tune Out” by The Format (from Interventions and Lullabies)
5. “Damaged” by Vivian Girls (from Vivian Girls)
6. “Go Where the Kids Go” by Those Unknown (from Those Unknown)
7. “Moaner” by Hagfish (from The Blasting Room)
8. “Favorite Shirt” by The Figgs (from Low-Fi at Society High)
9. “Lady Luck” by Swingin’ Utters (from Hatest Grits: B-Sides and Bullshit)
10. “Metropolitan World” by Teenage Frames (from The Kingsize Sessions)

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Currently Listening

1. “All’s Fair” by ALL (from Guilty)
2. “Everything Counts” by Depeche Mode (from The Singles 81-85)
3. “Think About It” by Flight of the Conchords (from Flight of the Conchords)
4. “Godspeed” by Jenny Lewis (from Acid Tongue)
5. “Astro Zombies” by The Misfits (from Misfits: Collection 1)
6. “Ghostdancing” by Simple Minds (from The Best of Simple Minds Disc 1)
7. “You Can Have It All” by Yo La Tengo (from Juno – Music from the Motion Picture [Deluxe Edition Soundtrack] Disc 2)
8. “After Hours” by We Are Scientists (from Nick & Norah’s Infinite Playlist)
9. “I Stand Corrected” by Vampire Weekend (from Vampire Weekend)
10. “Sugar Water” by Sixer (from Busted Knuckles and Heartbreak)

Saturday, March 28, 2009

It’s Official

As of Friday March 27th, I am no longer a member of the Democratic Party. For now I am an Independent, but that may change in the future (especially if there is a candidate in a local election that I think is worth supporting in a primary).

Currently Listening

1. “Beautiful Girl” by INXS (from The Greatest Hits)
2. “The Lonely” by Swingin’ Utters (from Hatest Grits: B-Sides and Bullshit)
3. “Wild Eyes” by Vivian Girls (from Vivian Girls)
4. “Get on Your Boots” by U2 (from No Line on the Horizon)
5. “Temptation Eyes” by The Replacements (from Let It Be [Deluxe Edition])
6. “Hyper Enough” by Superchunk (from Here’s Where the Strings Come In)
7. “Rooftop Brawl” by Bishop Allen (from GRRR…)
8. “Living Well id the Best Revenge” by R.E.M. (from Accelerate)
9. “Elizabeth” by Street Dogs (from State of Grace)
10. “I Love Rock N Roll” by The Jesus & Mary Chain (from 21 Singles 1984-1998)

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Who fears death and who is ready to face it?

Is the religious more prepared for death than the atheist? You might be surprised. Here is an excellent piece on this very subject over on Classical Liberal.

It May Not Matter

All of the bickering and fighting that we do as a nation may not matter if we get hit by a space storm.

Check this out –
It sounds ridiculous. Surely the sun couldn't create so profound a disaster on Earth. Yet an extraordinary report funded by NASA and issued by the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in January this year claims it could do just that.

Over the last few decades, western civilisations have busily sown the seeds of their own destruction. Our modern way of life, with its reliance on technology, has unwittingly exposed us to an extraordinary danger: plasma balls spewed from the surface of the sun could wipe out our power grids, with catastrophic consequences.

The projections of just how catastrophic make chilling reading. "We're moving closer and closer to the edge of a possible disaster," says Daniel Baker, a space weather expert based at the University of Colorado in Boulder, and chair of the NAS committee responsible for the report.

It is hard to conceive of the sun wiping out a large amount of our hard-earned progress. Nevertheless, it is possible. The surface of the sun is a roiling mass of plasma - charged high-energy particles - some of which escape the surface and travel through space as the solar wind. From time to time, that wind carries a billion-tonne glob of plasma, a fireball known as a coronal mass ejection (see "When hell comes to Earth"). If one should hit the Earth's magnetic shield, the result could be truly devastating.

The incursion of the plasma into our atmosphere causes rapid changes in the configuration of Earth's magnetic field which, in turn, induce currents in the long wires of the power grids. The grids were not built to handle this sort of direct current electricity. The greatest danger is at the step-up and step-down transformers used to convert power from its transport voltage to domestically useful voltage. The increased DC current creates strong magnetic fields that saturate a transformer's magnetic core. The result is runaway current in the transformer's copper wiring, which rapidly heats up and melts. This is exactly what happened in the Canadian province of Quebec in March 1989, and six million people spent 9 hours without electricity. But things could get much, much worse than that.

Just like that and we could be sent back to the Dark Ages. There is more in the article, but just this little bit is chilling enough. It just goes to show how little control we really have.

Why I like CD’s

I realize that there are a lot of things that make me a bit abnormal, but one in particular is that I don’t download music. Sure one big reason is because I have a pathetically slow internet connection at home, but beyond that I actually like CD’s. I like to have a physical product to hold and read. And read I do. I’m one of those people who plows through the liner notes and thank you lists on CD’s. Back in the day (when they were cassette tapes), that is how we learned about other bands (this was pre-internet). If it wasn’t for thank you lists in CD’s, record label catalogues, the few descent magazines, and recommendations of friends and record store folks (thank you Jim at Size Records), we would have been dependent on the radio and MTV for finding new music. Nowadays kids can find all of that stuff online and download it in seconds, but there is something inherently anti-intimate about downloading MP3’s. Sure you can read up all about a band on their website, but when you hold a CD or LP, in a way you are holding a part of the band. So when I hear stories about bands going all digital, there is a part of me that is sad. I’ll probably never hear that second Ben Weasel album or the Paul Westerberg digital only album because they’re not available on CD and may never be. I know that the CD is a dying medium and eventually I will need to come into the 21st century, but for now I’ll be clinging on to my CD’s until they are pulled from my cold, dead, hand and a half.

Okie Funk is right on Academic Freedom

In a recent post, local blogger and UCO professor Okie Funk makes an excellent point on the reaction of the State’s House of Representatives (well two of them at least) to the recent speech at OU by former Oxford University professor Richard Dawkins.

From the post –
State leaders also need to understand that reports of the local anti-evolution movement make their way through scientific and other intellectual communities throughout the country and world. These reports make the state seem backwards, isolated and unwelcoming among groups of people that could help move the state forward. This has the potential to hinder efforts recruiting top scientists and faculty to work in the state. This, in turn, hurts our students.

It also sends the wrong message to Oklahoma scientists, science faculty members and other faculty members. It tells them to avoid discourses, theories and research that might offend certain politicians or be labeled controversial. This applies to virtually all disciplines, and it could ultimately have a major dumbing-down effect on our students.

Thomsen and Hamilton have every right to express their views about evolution, but their actions have the potential to threaten university-level academic freedom, which is as vital as the energy sector in Oklahoma. Is this what they intend?


Now to be completely fair, Doc Hoc may not be the most objective person on this matter (okay, he’s probably as biased as those in the House calling for the investigation), but the point is valid nonetheless. I doubt that the State Representatives in question have any desire to harm our state’s standing in the academic world, but those are definitely the unintended consequences on their actions. Sure those in “academia” often live in their own little world, but that world is vital to the educational system in Oklahoma and the potential academic/research related business that may or may not consider the state based on our reputation.

100 Movies to See Before You Die

Here is another list of films to see before you die. One of these days I am going to make a list like this for films to see and albums to listen to/own before you die (sounds also like a great idea for Steve over at The Otter Limits). Thanks to Pop Candy for the find.

Screeching Weasel and The Riverdales to play Austin

Some towns have all the luck. Screeching Weasel and The Riverdales will be playing in Austin, TX in June. I have to admit, I’m not sure which band I’d like to see more. Hopefully Ben Weasel will bring the Screeching Weasel/Riverdales package to OKC this summer as well (not gonna hold my breath though).

Currently Reading




Book: The Atlantis Prophecy
Author: Thomas Greanias
Publisher: Pocket Star Books

This is a book that has been sitting on my ever growing “to read” shelf for about six months or so. I picked it up the other night and it sucked me right in (which hasn’t happened in a while with any book).

The Atlantis Prophecy is apparently the second book in a trilogy (I haven’t seen or read the other two) and follows the adventures of archaeologist Conard Yeats and Vatican linguist Serena Serghetti. The two are sent on a deadly mission after Yeats buries his father, only to discover at the funeral that his father has sent him an encrypted message via his unique tombstone. The is an ancient conspiracy and evil secret society called the Alignment set to take over the world, unless Yeats and Serghetti can solve the mystery in time.

This political, historical thriller is very reminiscent of the works of Dan Brown and the National Treasure movies, not that that is a bad thing mind you. In fact it is a good thing. The book is faced paced, full of history and intrigue, and the characters are fairly well developed. Fans of Steve Alten, Michael Criton, and the aforementioned Brown should give this book a read.

Bruce calls the First Family “trash”

Talk show host Tammy Bruce has reached an all new low when she referred to the First Family as trash – “This is what we've got -- you know what we've got? We've got trash in the White House.”

Tammy Bruce is a perfect example of everything that is wrong with civil discourse in this country. It is one thing to call the President or the First Lady out on some policy or cause that he/she is supporting, but to call them trash is not only tacky but it is a personal attack that accomplishes nothing. Tammy Bruce has proven once again that she is nothing more than a classless polemic.

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

CD Reviews

bishop allen
Artist: Bishop Allen
Album: GRRR…
Label: Dead Oceans, Inc.

I first heard Bishop Allen in the movie Nick & Norah’s Infinite Playlist. They played a bit of a song in the film that ended up on the soundtrack. The song wasn’t bad so when I asked the nice folks at Guestroom Records about the band’s new CD, they said that if I like what I heard in the movie then I would probably like the CD. So I took their advice and picked up the CD. Bishop Allen play what can best be described as indie pop. Overall it’s not bad but I think that it will take time for me to get into it and properly enjoy the album.


tim
Artist: The Replacements
Album: Tim [Expanded Edition]
Label: Rhino

1985’s Tim was the major label debut for The Replacements and IMHO one of the band’s greatest achievements. While not quite as off kilter as its predecessor Let It Be, Tim was still hallmark Replacements. The band took their extreme energy and pop sensibilities and poured out one of the great albums of the decade, even while going through internal tensions that eventually led to the firing of guitarist Bobby Stinson. While considered by some to be a bit of a misstep in execution, Tim includes some of the band’s classics and favorites (“Here Comes a Regular,” “Bastards of Young,” and “Left of the Dial” just to name a few). This reissue also includes two early versions of “Can’t Hardly Wait” (which would later appear on Pleased to Met Me), an alternative version of “Here Comes a Regular,” along with three other tracks and excellent liner notes that lay out the band at the time of Tim. This is a must for fans of the band, or those wanting a look at not only this great band, but the amazing alternative music scene of the 1980’s.


boy
Artist: U2
Album: Boy [Deluxe Edition]
Label: Universal Island Records

U2’s 1980 debut album Boy shines in this two disc reissue. The great thing about the slew of reissues and deluxe/expanded edition CDs that have come out in the past few years is that they bring great music from the past, polish it up (generally making it sound a bit better, or at least louder), and include liner notes that tell the story of the album and great extra tracks. Often it is the extras and the liner notes that attract me to these type of releases, and Boy is no different. The second disc of this set includes much of the pre-Boy U2 recordings that have been unavailable for years. Also there is a book with pictures and liner notes telling the story of Boy, along with the original cover art. Musically Boy is a powerful journey that showcases a young band just getting started on the road to greatness. Includes the classics “I Will Follow,” “Stories for Boys,” “Twilight,” “The Electric Co.,” and “Out of Control” (among others). Those who are not diehard fans of the band, could get away with the single disc version of this reissue, but they are missing out if they do.

nick and norah
Artist: Various Artists
Album: Nick & Norah’s Infinite Playlist Original Motion Picture Soundtrack
Label: Atlantic Records

The film Nick & Norah’s Infinite Playlist takes two high school kids in a trip through the clubs of the NYC music scene in search of a secret show by their favorite band Where’s Fluffy?. The kink is that Nick and Norah just met, plus Nick is hung up on Tris a girl from Norah’s school (who Norah also cannot stand). Nick’s band mates intervene and try to make a love connection between the two and hilarity ensues. The film itself was surprisingly good as is the soundtrack. Consisting of mostly indie pop, the highlights include Bishop Allen’s “Middle Management,” The Dead 60’s “Riot Radio,” We Are Scientists’ “After Hours,” and Shout Out Louds’ “Very Loud.” I could see this soundtrack and movie filling the kind of place that Pretty In Pink or Pump Up the Volume did for my generation of underground and alternative youths.

Quote of the Day

Politicians are a lot like diapers. They should be changed frequently, and for the same reason.

-- Robin Williams as Tom Dobbs (quoting Benjamin Franklin) in the movie Man of the Year

What I Read

Originally I was going to do a post on the blogs that I like to read, but then I thought why stop there? So this post is dedicated to the blogs, books, and authors/writers who I like to read.

Blogs that I Read –
The following are blogs that I read that I feel are kindred spirits in many ways. Sure a couple of the writers I consider to be friends (one of them is written by one of my best friends), but they are also extremely well done, thoughtful, full of common sense, and not blindly partisan.

The Otter Limits
DaveTown
Brad Neese: Living Large in Oklahoma
Classically Liberal


Blogs that I Need to Read More Often –
Here is a list of blogs that I really enjoy, but for some reason (probably having to do with my slow internet connection) do not read as much as I’d like to.

Andrew Sullivan
Mainstream Baptist
A Dribble Of Ink
John Dean
Wormtalk and Slugspeak


Books that I Recommend –
The following is a list of books that I have recommended that people read over the years. My copy of a few of them made the rounds at my previous place of employment. I’ve included each books genre in parentheses.

Dhampir by Barb & JC Hendee (fantasy)
Angels & Demons by Dan Brown (thriller)
Deception Point by Dan Brown (thriller)
MEG by Steve Alten (science fiction / thriller)
The LOCH by Steve Alten (science fiction / thriller)
The Shell Game by Steve Alten (thriller)
The Word & Void Trilogy (Running with the Demon; A Knight of the Word; Angel Fire East) by Terry Brooks (fantasy)
American Creation: Triumphs and Tragedies in the Founding of the Republic by Joseph Ellis (nonfiction / history)
The New American Story by Bill Bradley (nonfiction / politics)


Authors that I Follow –
Here are the authors whose work I try to follow as closely as possible. A few I have fallen from, but in most cases I have read either most of (or all in some cases) their books, or at least most of a particular series that they write.

Steve Alten
Terry Brooks
Dan Brown
Charlene Harris
Barb & JC Hendee
JK Rowling

Means and Ends

Here is an excellent piece from the blog Classically Liberal.

The following is a bit of the post (the opening paragraphs), but I highly recommend reading the entire thing –
It is an obvious truth that much of life is a series of choices of ends and means. Ends are the goals that we individually pursue. Means are the methods by which we seek to accomplish our goals.

Under classical liberal theory it is the means that may be the proper concern of the state and not the goals. It is the means that potentially violate the rights of others not the goals. Goals themselves have no ability to violate the life, liberty or property of others. Not even clearly malevolent goals can do that—such as the desired death of someone that you hate.

The goal itself does nothing; it is the means only, which has the ability to violate your rights. Take this murderous impulse as the goal and look at two different means to accomplish it. One is the direct action of physically causing your demise. I have obviously violated your rights if I kill you. But I could seek my goal through other means as well. For instance, I could put a curse on you. It is not likely to be effective. But my wish to see your demise itself does not violate your rights. There are a series of means by which I could ineffectively seek my goal. I could pray to some deity that he/she/it strike you down. I note that some fundamentalists engage in such prayers for people they dislike on a rather frequent basis. Eventually they get their prayers answered but then eventually they would have whether they were praying or not. Since their method had nothing to do with your death they have not violated your
rights. At worst they have wasted their time.

For classical liberal theory it is the means that then may be regulated in some manner; and then only if the means is one that violates the life, liberty or property of another person. Mere “harm” is not enough. My refusing to purchase a product from you causes you some harm. It limits your income, but it violates no rights. I can even make you worse off than before without violating your rights. The purchase illustration shows that. Had I been a regular customer, one you counted on to buy products from you, and then I stopped buying, you are harmed. But unless I’ve some contract with you, requiring me to purchase items, your rights have not been touched.

NO MORE POWER!!!

In what has got to be a sheer act of insanity, the Obama Administration is going to ask Congress for even more power.

The administration's proposal contains two pieces. First, it would empower a government agency to take on the new role of systemic risk regulator with broad oversight of any and all financial firms whose failure could disrupt the broader economy. The Federal Reserve is widely considered to be the leading candidate for this assignment. But some critics warn that this could conflict with the Fed's other responsibilities, particularly its control over monetary policy.

The government also would assume the authority to seize such firms if they totter toward failure.

Besides seizing a company outright, the document states, the Treasury Secretary could use a range of tools to prevent its collapse, such as guaranteeing losses, buying assets or taking a partial ownership stake. Such authority also would allow the government to break contracts, such as the agreements to pay $165 million in bonuses to employees of AIG's most troubled unit.

The Treasury secretary could act only after consulting with the president and getting a recommendation from two-thirds of the Federal Reserve Board, according to the plan.

Does this scare the living crap out of anyone else out there, or is it just me? Yes there needs to be more regulation of the markets (or more precisely more regulation of the individuals participating in the markets), but what was wrong with the old “model of financial regulation, which relies on independent agencies that are shielded from the political process”? In fact, why not just re-implement some of the regulations that were stripped away during the Reagan/Bush/Bush years?

Needless to say, this is a huge disappointment to me and appears to be nothing more than a power grab by the Democrats. But here’s the catch to this kind of thinking…what happens when your party is no longer in power? There will be a time (maybe sooner than later if they can get their act together) that the Republicans will be in power. For those of you out there who think that this is power that the Executive Branch needs to have, let me ask you one simple question: Would you want Dick Cheney to have this power? This is the same argument that I used when the Bush Administration was going all power grabby, except my example was Hillary Clinton. The thought of either of those individuals (or any other for that matter) with that kind of power should scare every single American to death. The last thing ANY of these people need is more power.

The thing that made me regret my vote for Bush in 2000 was the administrations flagrant abuse of power (done on the name of security). For eight years we watched the Constitution get trampled on by the GOP in the name of security. During the campaign, Obama promised to be a different kind of politician, to end the abuses of Washington and set us on a new course. Well…so far, no good. At this point, the Obama Administration has acted exactly like the Bush Administration did in 2000 (with a slight difference in philosophy, but the same exact end game…more power for the party and those in power). This is the point where I officially regret my vote.

Changing pace

During my time off (thank you food poisoning) I had a lot time to think about what I want to do with this blog. See, even when I started to feel better, I really had little to no interest in getting on the computer and banging out more nonsense about the government and state of world affairs. So in an effort to save my own sanity and to keep blogging, I’ve decided to focus more time to writing about things like music, books, and movies/DVDs. Sure there will still be the political post from time to time (I’ve got one that I am going to do a bit later today, but for the most part I am going to step aside from the political insanity.

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Out of commission

My blogging has been sporadic this week for a few reasons. First off my kids have been on Spring Break, so I have been busy keeping an eye on the neighborhood kids as they play at our house. Then on Tuesday I got food poisoning, which sent me to the ER and then to my doctor, and is going to keep me off solid foods for at least three to four days and out of work for a week. So needless to say, I have not been up to getting on the computer. I have been watching the spectacle of the local blogosphere on my cell phone though and have been overall pretty sickened by what I’ve seen. There are a few shining lights in this dark abyss, but mostly it’s the same partisan nonsense. Sad really…

Currently Listening

Today we’re got another 4x10, this time with Joy Division, Blondie, The Epoxies, and The Methadones.

1. “Atrocity Exhibition” by Joy Division (from Closer)
2. “A Shark in Jets Clothing” by Blondie (from Blondie)
3. “Kung Fu Girls” by Blondie (from The Platinum Collection Disc 1)
4. “Interzone” by Joy Division (from Unknown Pleasures)
5. “Dreaming” by Blondie (from The Platinum Collection Disc 1)
6. “Hit a Nerve” by The Methadones (from Not Economically Viable)
7. “My New World” by The Epoxies (from My New World)
8. “(I’m Always Touched by Your) Presence, Dear” by Blondie (from The Platinum Collection Disc 1)
9. “Tide is High” by Blondie (from The Platinum Collection Disc 2)
10. “Struggle Like No Other” by The Epoxies (from Stop the Future)

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

The 9/12 Project

Glenn Beck has launched The 9/12 Project and this is something that I applaud and fully support.

Here’s an excerpt from Beck’s 3/17 show (read the entire transcript here) –
GLENN: 9/10 we were burying our heads in the sand or we were playing politics. It was about Republicans or Democrats. On 9/11 we were freaking out and no one knew who attacked us, where did this come from, what is this. On 9/12 no one in the government had to tell us what to do. We just did it. We went and we found a place to give blood. We went and we gave money. We gathered together. We gathered our family around. We prayed. We were the people that our grandparents were and nobody had to tell us. But then again the parties got involved and George Bush told us to do our patriotic duty and go shopping. That's offensive. That's not our patriotic duty. That's part of the reason we're here now today because our patriotic duty was to go shopping. That's not it. And I remember saying on the air, "Please, Mr. President, give us something to do. Let us be involved in the solution." It's not just, oh, we're going to go and bomb them. We've got to fundamentally change. We've got to be involved. Give us something to do. And they didn't -- well, no, I take that back. The two parties, what they did is they gave us something to do, argue with each other and hate each other. And I was part of it. I didn't see it. I didn't see. Well, now I do. And I started seeing it, what, 2006, 2004 and said, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, guys, we're on the wrong track here; wait a minute; see what's going on? And others have woken up. And it's both the Republicans and the Democrats. It's both of them. And we just need to be those 9/12 people.

[…]

You know, in Iran if you're looking for the twelfth Imam, they call you a Twelver. The Twelvers over in Iran are evil. They are so bad that the Ayatollah Khomeini back after the Islamic revolution banned them, wanted them all killed. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a Twelver. But you know what? I'm not looking for the twelfth Imam, but I'm a Twelver, too. I'm a 9/12er. And that's what I announced on Friday. Commit yourself to live the principles that you knew were true and the values that you knew were true on 9/12. Become a 9/12er and don't be afraid of it. Don't be ashamed. Try to understand all of what's going on in your world through those values and those principles and don't -- you know what, I notice that the website is -- has been -- I mean, it's remarkable what's happening. It'sthe912project.com, the912project.com. And it's a meeting place to look at the different news and then try to find solution and what principles are we violating. It's a place where you can find some of the quotes from the founding fathers that might help you solve. There's going to be so much more on this. But really hope this is a meeting place where you can find solutions and you can present solutions and you can meet together and you can say, look, we're going to do this project, we're going to do a march on Washington and it's going to be on this day, and you can try to put it all together as long as it's all framed with those principles and values, then I'd be with you. I'd be for you. The minute it gets out of -- the minute it becomes a movement for power and a movement for political clout or a movement for anything else other than those principles and those values, I'm in. The minute it -- or I'm out the minute it becomes about that. I'm in as long as it becomes about those.


The organization’s Mission Statement, 9 Principles, and 12 Values are also very telling. While I often disagree with Beck, I have always found him to be sincere and someone who truly wants to bridge the things that divide us and I think that this organization is an extension of that. We can all agree on most, if not all, of the principle and values that Beck has outlined with this organization and I think that this is a great way for people to get involved and work towards taking our country back from the power mad whores that are currently running it.

Thinking of making a change

I’ve been a registered Democrat my entire voting life, but lately I have been giving serious consideration to changing it. For years I have wanted to be registered as an independent but in doing so I would not be able to participate in the primary process (thank you restrictive voting laws in Oklahoma). Plus in my heart of hearts, I believe in the same things that are the core and staples of the Democratic Party (or what they used to be at least).

Since the election last fall I have lost all faith and confidence in the two major parties. They no longer care about us, only their campaign contributors and special interests. I am completely sickened by our elected officials of both parties and more and more every day I see ours as a broken system. It is a broken system that, I believe, our elected officials want to stay broken because if it is fixed, then they would lose power. And at the end of the day, power is all that seems to matter.

Here I am, at the point of seriously considering abandoning thee two major parties but where would I go? I could just register as an independent but I would have no say in primaries of any kind in this state. This leaves me to looking into alternative parties. The two that come to mind that I am considering are the Libertarian Party and the Green Party.

So I decided to try and find some online tests to help me out. The first one I tried required that I register for the site and asked for tons of personal information, so I didn’t bother with it. I then took this test, which said that my idea party was the Democratic Party (I had issues with a lot of the questions and available answers though). I then took this test, and according to it I fit in best with the Libertarian Party (again I had issues with these questions and available answers). Then I took this test, and it said that I scored 50 Republican, 50 Democrat, and 13 Green. According to this test, I overall fit into the category of a Democrat (here are the specific results – “Conservative/Progressive score: 8 You are a social moderate. You think the progressive movement is overall well meaning, but sometimes it goes too far. On issues like abortion and affirmative action, you see the negatives of both extremes on the issue. You probably value religion, but at the same time you think it should still stay separate from the government. Capitalist Purist/Social Capitalist score: 8 You are a Moderate Capitalist. You support an economy that is by and large a free market, but has public programs to help people who can't help themselves or need a little help. Pretty much you believe in the American economy how it currently is. Libertarian/Authoritarian score: 3 You are libertarian. You think that the government is making way too many unnecessary laws that are taking away our innate rights. You believe that the government's job is primarily to protect people from harming other people, but after that they should mind their own business, and if we give the government too much power in controlling our lives, it can lead to fascism. Pacifist/Militarist score: 6 You're a Moderate. You think that in very rare occasions, the United States should invade a country in order to make the world better by spreading democracy or ending a tyrants rule. You also think that defense is very important, and we shouldn't lower the defense budget. You think that, while the Iraq War probably was a mistake, that we can make the world a better place by sticking with it and spreading democracy in the middle east.”)

After all of that, it seems like I am already a member of the party that best fits my beliefs (that last test I think summed me up pretty well in the results). So now the question becomes, what can I do to fix the Democratic Party or do I just give up because it is too far gone? Sadly I still don’t have the answer to that question.

PS --
In my searches for quizzes, I came upon this article, which does a very good job in laying out the different criteria for choosing a political party.

Foot meet mouth

Iowa Senator Charles Grassley (R) suggested Monday that the executives at AIG should either resign or commit suicide.

Money Quote –
"I suggest, you know, obviously, maybe they ought to be removed," Grassley said. "But I would suggest the first thing that would make me feel a little bit better toward them if they'd follow the Japanese example and come before the American people and take that deep bow and say, I'm sorry, and then either do one of two things: resign or go commit suicide.

"And in the case of the Japanese, they usually commit suicide before they make any apology."

I’m sure there would be more outrage over this comment if 95% of the population didn’t agree with him. And to be completely fair, his spokesman did clarify that the Senator wasn’t calling for literal suicide, “but said those who accept tax dollars and spend them on travel and bonuses do so irresponsibly.” I think on that we can all agree.

Currently Listening: St. Patrick’s Day Edition

In honor of St. Patrick’s Day, today’s Currently Listening is all Irish (or at least Irish-American).

1. “Cadence to Arms” by Dropkick Murphys (from Do or Die)
2. “Drunken Lullabies” by Flogging Molly (from Drunken Lullabies)
3. “If I Should Fall From Grace with God” by The Pogues (from If I Should Fall From Grace with God)
4. “Goodmornin’ Da” by The Tossers (from The Valley of the Shadow of Death)
5. “Come Out Ye Black & Tans” by Hudson Falcons (from Desperation & Revolution)
6. “The Wild Rover” by Dropkick Murphys (from Sing Loud, Sing Proud)
7. “Salty Dog” by Flogging Molly (from Swagger)
8. “Medley: The Recruiting Sergeant/The Rocky Road to Dublin” by The Pogues (from If I Should Fall From Grace with God)
9. “The Valley of the Shadow of Death” by The Tossers (from The Valley of the Shadow of Death)
10. “Amazing Grace” by Dropkick Murphys (from The Gang’s All Here)

Monday, March 16, 2009

No Empathy

Last night I was sitting with a new agent on our team listening to his calls for a few hours. This is something that my supervisor has me do whenever we get someone new out of training on the team. With this gentleman there were the standard concerns: handle time and quality. Coming out of training (and this thing called “transition” which is essentially a few weeks on the phones with a lot of coaches around to help and answer questions) can be rough for anyone, so my boss likes to have someone sit with the new folks to get an idea of how they are holding up and to provide tips and suggestions for navigating the systems and bringing the handle time within goal.

My first impression of the gentleman that I sat with last night was that he had a great tone of voice but that he needed help learning how to segue from one question, issue, or step to the next one (including closing the call). Then the more I listened, the more I realized that he wasn’t using any empathy statements. In call centers, empathy statements are a big deal. The bosses want to hear their agents and representatives empathizing with the customer. This is a good thing as long as it’s not phony. So this guy’s last call before going to lunch is customer who needs to reschedule an appointment because his son is in the hospital. Immediately I think, “oh God I’m so sorry,” but this agent didn’t say a thing. At no point did he say that he was sorry or offer any well wishes for the customer’s son. After the call was over, my feedback centered on the need for empathy statements, to which this guy said, “yeah I am sorry, but then again I’m really not.” He went on to say something lame about just wanting to stick to business and get the call over with (which is a laugh considering how outrageously high his handle time is, but I held my tongue).

This guy’s gross lack of empathy for another human being made my physically ill. I was already irritated with his attitude that he knew all of the answers and the fact that he blew off all of the feedback that I offered, but then to see his callous attitude to someone whose child was in the hospital was mind boggling and disturbing. To me his behavior was a classic example of a larger virus eating away at this country. People are blind to the suffering of others and way too many out there seem to be completely unable to empathize with others. If we can’t learn to again empathize with each other, we’re in serious trouble.

Currently Listening

We’re doing another 4x10 today, this time with The Smithereens, The Sex Pistols, Vampire Weekend, and Jenny Lewis.

1. “No Feelings” by The Sex Pistols (from Never Mind the Bollocks, Here’s The Sex Pistols)
2. “Bodies” by The Sex Pistols (from Never Mind the Bollocks, Here’s The Sex Pistols)
3. “In a Lonely Place” by The Smithereens (from Blown to Smithereens: The Best of The Smithereens)
4. “A Girl Like You” by The Smithereens (from Blown to Smithereens: The Best of The Smithereens)
5. “Time Won’t Let Me” by The Smithereens (from Blown to Smithereens: The Best of The Smithereens)
6. “Oxford Comma” by Vampire Weekend (from Vampire Weekend)
7. “Bad Man’s World” by Jenny Lewis (from Acid Tongue)
8. “Submission” by The Sex Pistols (from Never Mind the Bollocks, Here’s The Sex Pistols)
9. “Blood and Roses” by The Smithereens (from Blown to Smithereens: The Best of The Smithereens)
10. “Rise Up with Fists!!” by Jenny Lewis with the Watson Twins (from Rabbit Fur Coat)

Sunday, March 15, 2009

Brilliant and truthful

Thanks to Classically Liberal for the find.

Steele takes bold stand on homosexuality

RNC Chairman Michael Steele has angered and disappointed many conservatives for his comments that homosexuality is not a choice. Some have even wondered if he is actually a mole for the DNC (see linked story).

I applaud Steele for taking this stance. It has long been my opinion the homosexuality is not a choice and it is encouraging to see that leader of the RNC taking that same common sense position.

Socialism and Inflation

Here is an excellent piece on socialism and inflation from the blog Classically Liberal.

Thanks to Dave at DaveTown for pointing out this blog.

The Street may be a little emptier

The company that produces the PBS series Sesame Street, Sesame Workshop, is cutting about a fifth of its workforce. The nonprofit company started in 1968 as the Children’s Television Workshop has produced not only Sesame Street but The Electric Company, 3-2-1 Contact, and Dragon Tales, just to name a few.

I grew up on shows like Sesame Street and 3-2-1 Contact, and other PBS classics like Mister Rogers Neighborhood, so it makes me sad to see this company having to cut back, but considering the economy it is not surprising.

Currently Listening

We’re doing a 4x10 today with New Order, Mojo Nixon, The Clash, and Soundgarden.

1. “Bizarre Love Triangle” by New Order (from Substance)
2. “Blow Up the Outside World” by Soundgarden (from A-Sides)
3. “Disney if the Enemy” by Mojo Nixon (from The Real Sock Ray Blue)
4. “I’m So Bored with the U.S.A.” by The Clash (from The Clash)
5. “Temptation” by New Order (from Substance)
6. “Tankman Blues” by Mojo Nixon (from The Real Sock Ray Blue)
7. “I’m Not Down” by The Clash (from London Calling)
8. “My Free Will Just Ain’t Willin’” by Mojo Nixon (from Whereabouts Unknown)
9. “Gotta Be Free” by Mojo Nixon (from Whereabouts Unknown)
10. “Outshined” by Soundgarden (from A-Sides)

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Do you ever forget?

Do you ever get an idea for something to blog about and then stop yourself and think Did I do that already? That happened to me last night. I was at work and I thought I need to do a post on the songs that I my funeral, but them I stopped and thought Oh crap, haven't I done that already?

Ranking the Albums and My Dream Set: U2

In honor of the announcement that U2 will be playing in Norman on their 360 tour later this year, I give you my rankings of (most of) the band’s albums and my dream set list (if I could pick the songs that they were to play). Both of these lists were originally posted as comments on two different posts on The Otter Limits (found here and here).

Ranking the Albums
[Note – I have not included Zooropa, Pop, or No Line on the Horizon because I have never owned these albums.]
1. Rattle & Hum
2. The Joshua Tree
3. The Unforgettable Fire
4. Achtung Baby
5. War
6. Boy
7. All That You Can’t Leave Behind
8. How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb
9. October


My Dream Set
[Note -- I actually made a mixed CD a few years ago of my U2 “dream set.” It ended up being two CDs long. This list is basically the same as those CDs (I listened to them while making the list) with a few more songs thrown in. The list is in the order I would like to see the songs performed.]
“City of Blinding Lights” (from How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb)
“Vertigo” (from How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb)
"I Will Follow” (from Boy)
“In God’s Country” (from The Joshua Tree)
“Elevation” (from All That You Can’t Leave Behind)
“Gloria” (from October)
“Desire” (from Rattle & Hum)
“All I Want is You” (from Rattle & Hum)
“Is That All?” (from October)
“The Electric Co.” (from Boy)
“Beautiful Day” (from All That You Can’t Leave Behind)
“Where the Streets Have No Name” (from The Joshua Tree)
“With or Without You” (from The Joshua Tree)
“Running to Stand Still” (from The Joshua Tree)
“All Because of You” (from How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb)
“Sunday Bloody Sunday” (from War)
“Bullet the Blue Sky” (from The Joshua Tree)
“Who’s Gonna Ride Your Wild Horses?” (from Achtung Baby)
“God Part II” (from Rattle & Hum)
“Zoo Station” (from Achtung Baby)
“The Fly” (from Achtung Baby)
“Bad” (from The Unforgettable Fire)
“New Years Day” (from War)
“Even Better Than the Real Thing” (from Achtung Baby)
“Out of Control” (from Boy)
“Hawkmoon 269” (from Rattle & Hum)
“Stuck in a Moment You Can’t Get Out Of” (from All That You Can’t Leave Behind)
“Angel of Harlem” (from Rattle & Hum)
“Pride (In the Name of Love)” (from The Unforgettable Fire)
“Two Hearts Beat as One” (from War)
“Rejoice” (from October)
“Stay (Faraway, So Close)” (from Zooropa)
“One” (from Achtung Baby)
“Tryin’ to Throw Your Arms Around the World” (from Achtung Baby)
“I Still Haven’t Found What I’m Looking For” (from The Joshua Tree)
“A Sort of Homecoming” (from The Unforgettable Fire)
“MLK” (from The Unforgettable Fire)
“Yahweh” (from How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb)
“Walk On” (from All That You Can’t Leave Behind)
“40” (from War)

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Staying out of it

Lately there have been some pretty heated discussions on various local blogs regarding the abortion issue and specifically FOCA. After watching the spectacle unfold I have decided to completely stay out of it. Yes much of the discussion was civil and thoughtful, but a lot of it has devolved into ugly bickering and rehashing of the traditional talking points on the issue. I have expressed my opinions on abortion before and really don’t feel the need to do it any more. This debate rarely, if ever, ends well (usually it ends with the participants on both sides mad as hell and convinced that those on the opposite side are stupid). In many ways, I see this “debate” as an exercise in futility and a great issue used by those in power to distract the masses. I know that sounds bad and I truly mean no insult to anyone by it, that’s just how I see it.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Ranking the Albums: R.E.M.

For this installment of Ranking the Albums, I’ve gone with another one of Steve’s suggestions, R.E.M. Like with my Essential R.E.M. post, I am only including albums from the Bill Berry years.

1. Out of Time
2. Lifes Rich Pageant
3. Document
4. Automatic for the People
5. Murmur
6. Monster
7. Reckoning
8. Fables of the Reconstruction
9. New Adventures in Hi-Fi

Sunday, March 08, 2009

When is it opinion and when is it propaganda?

Recently a local blogger accused another of spreading propaganda on a particularly emotional issue. While I have yet to go through and read the propaganda post in question, my initial thought on the accusation was “how do you know that this isn’t this person’s honest opinion on the issue?” Bloggers, myself included, often make judgment calls about the words of others and many times we claim to know the motive of the individual in question. If we are honest with ourselves, we can all admit that there is no way for any of us to know the true motivation or thought process of another person. None of us can read minds and no matter what some out there might claim to know, they don’t know. They are just making noise.

This does beg a bigger question however. When is something that someone (a local blogger for instance) writes opinion and when is it propaganda? I have to admit that I am not sure that I have the answer to this one.

Ranking the Albums: Dropkick Murphys

I got this idea from Steve at The Otter Limits (who has already covered U2, ALL/Descendents, Green Day, and Screeching Weasel) and he specifically suggested that I highlight this band.

The Dropkick Murphys started back in the mid-to-late 1990’s, and have since released six full length studio albums, one live album, tow split CDs, two CD EPs, countless seven inches, and two singles collections. For this ranking I am sticking to the band’s full length studio albums. You can see their entire discography here.

A note on to how I rank albums. When I think of my preference of one album over an other, I think of the album as a whole unit and not of the individual songs. That is why there can be an album by a band that I don’t like as much as their others, but could still have my favorite song by said band on it. In the case of this band, I can honestly say that I really like (if not love) all of these albums, and all of them have songs that just blow me away, but some are better cohesive units than others.

1. The Warrior’s Code
2. Do or Die
3. Blackout
4. The Meanest of Times
5. Sing Loud, Sing Proud
6. The Gang’s All Here

Currently Listening: DKM Edition

In preparation for my next post, I’ve the Dropkick Murphys’ folder from My Music, dropped it into Media Player and hit shuffle. This is the result.

1. “Loyal to No One” (from The Meanest of Times)
2. “Boston Asphalt” (from The Gang’s All Here)
3. “Tessie” (from The Warrior’s Code)
4. “The Auld Triangle” (from The Warrior’s Code)
5. “Finnegan’s Wake” (from Do or Die)
6. “Far Away Coast” (from Do or Die)
7. “Going Strong” (from The Gang’s All Here)
8. “Rude Awakenings” (from The Meanest of Times)
9. “This is Your Life” (from Blackout)
10. “Time to Go” (from Blackout)

Friday, March 06, 2009

Quote of the Day # 2

From my perspective there is a world of difference between a nation, a government, and a citizenry. In a perfect situation, the nation has faith, the government has rules, and the citizens have religion…and never shall any of them impinge upon the others.

· I want the nation to have faith, in the sense that I want the collective whole of the populace and the institutions they’ve established to hold up the ideals we all have in common as sacred and inviolate; as much as we disagree individually, there is plenty of common ground to work from.

· I want my government to have rules that facilitate such a diverse group of constituents to live among one another in a respectful and productive society, and which preserve not only their individual ideologies but also that shared national faith from all forms of harm (and those are the only rules I want it to have, frankly).

· I want my citizenry to have as much or as little religion as they want, and for their religious views to remain as constant or as mutable as they see fit, because theological inquiry is the ancestral foundation of all philosophical inquiry, which is how a country comes to those shared conclusions at the top of my list.

-- Respondent A (same person as seen in this post)

I couldn't agree more.

Quote of the Day

The quintessential revolution is that of the spirit, born of an intellectual conviction of a need for change in those mental attitudes and values which shape the course of a nation’s development. A revolution which aims merely at changing official policies and institutions with a view to improvement in material conditions has little chance of genuine success. Without a revolution of the spirit, the forces which produce the iniquities of the old order would continue to be operative…It is not enough merely to call for freedom, democracy and human rights. There has to be a united determination…to make sacrifices in the name of enduring truths, to resist the corrupting influence of desire, ill will, ignorance, and fear.

Saints, it has been said, are the sinners who keep on trying. So free men are the oppressed who go on trying and who in the process make themselves fit to bear the responsibilities…which will maintain a free society…A people who would build a nation in which strong, democratic institutions are firmly established as a guarantee against state-induced power must first learn to liberate their own minds from apathy and fear.
-- Aung San Suu Kyi from Freedom From Fear and Other Writings (I found this passage in the book Eastern Religions: Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, Confucianism, Shinto)

Power to the people

President Obama was right in his campaign. We do need change in America, but the change that we need is not the kind that either party would dare to implement because the change that we need would decrease their power. The change that we need is citizen empowerment or to put it another way, we need the power to go back to the people.

I think that there are four big things that could be done to accomplish this goal:
  1. Institute term limits on all members on the Senate and House of Representatives.
  2. Institute public financing of all elections and increase the pay of all politicians (thus requiring politicians to pay their own way on all trips and taking the power away from PACs and lobbyists).
  3. Institute a ban on gerrymandering.
  4. Institute the Fair Tax (or some other simplified tax system).

These changes would dramatically change the power structure in this country, put more power, onus, and responsibility into the hands of the citizens, and return our system of governance back to its democratic and republican roots.

If I was to ever run for President, my platform would be based on these principles and issues (along with a few great ideas that I stole from a friend: a. Decriminalize all vice, b. Institute a Federal open-carry statute, c. Subsidize all education and healthcare). Mine would be a campaign based on liberty and empowerment. In fact I’ve already come up with a great line for speeches: “We are here to bring forth the promise of ’92 and the hope of ’08, but we are going to bring that hope and promise to the people.” (Okay, it needs work but it’s a start.) How about these for campaign ads? “Dave 2012: Liberty or death” or “Dave 2012 – Bringing the power back to the people.”

All kidding aside, something seriously needs to be done to reign in the monster that is the federal government and the Democratic and Republican Parties, because none of them are looking out for our best interests (even though that is what we pay them to do).

The U.S. is “forsaking God”?

According to a recent poll on OneNewsNow.com, 94.47% of respondents stated that they believed that the United States is “forsaking God and heading down the same road as secularized Europe.”

Two questions came to mind after reading this poll:

1) Hasn’t this always been a secular country (legally and Constitutionally at least)?

2) What would be wrong with being a secular nation?

The answer to the first question, if I have understood all of the history that I have read, is that yes we are a secular nation, legally speaking at least.

The second question is obviously one that can only be answered with an opinion. My opinion is that being secular would not be a bad thing, but I truly don’t see that happening. Outside of the Middle East, the United States is the most religious nation on the planet. Our history and culture are steeped with religion and I just don’t foresee it going anywhere anytime soon.

This seems to me to be another wedge issue. Making the secularism battle cry is a great way to rally the troops, but what good does it do? Does this actually help address the issues facing us? Does this make America a freer, safer, more equitable, or better place? My guess is probably not.

For the bloggers with the disclaimers, legal notices, and fine print

I’ve noticed legal disclaimers on quite a few blogs. Most of them refer to content copied from other sources and seem to basically say “please don’t sue me.”

My question to those with such notices is, what prompted you to include the disclaimer on your blog? Would you suggest other bloggers to do the same?

Currently Listening

1. “Rush” by Big Audio Dynamite (from Plant BAD: Greatest Hits)
2. “Rambler Song” by Shellac (from The Rude Gesture)
3. “Do Wot You Do” by INXS (from Pretty in Pink)
4. “Very Loud” by Shout Out Louds (from Nick & Norah’s Infinite Playlist)
5. “Minute with the Maker” by The Amazing Royal Crowns (from The Amazing Royal Crowns)
6. “The Fly” by U2 (from Achtung Baby)
7. “Gift Horse” by The Thrones (from Alraune)
8. “Rock & Roll” by The Velvet Underground (from Loaded)
9. “Hold On” by Tim Armstrong (from A Poet’s Life)
10. “Fast Lane” by Urban Dance Squad (from Mental Floss for the Globe)

Thursday, March 05, 2009

Who qualifies?

A friend of mine sent out this link to an email group for discussion. The link goes to a quiz by the Washington Post the is designed to help people find out if they qualify for the President’s foreclosure prevention program. The following are some of the responses from this discussion. (Note – I wasn’t sure if it completely uncouth or not to publish parts of this discussion. I finally decided that the topic and responses were too good not to share. If anyone from the list reads this, please don’t hate me. Names are not included.)

The originator of the email included the following in his initial email –

I don’t qualify because was responsible. Now I wan to refinance my loan and it’s going to cost a fortune to do so. Thank you Mr. President! Keep on rewarding the irresponsible!

The following questions were the posed to the originator by Respondent A (for lack of a better term) –
So, to clarify, is your position:
· That all of the people who do qualify are irresponsible and ergo undeserving?
· That you are deserving of assistance, and at least some of the people who will benefit aren’t?
· That the entire concept is flawed, and people who fail should simply fail?


Respondent B then stated –

I am aware that you are speaking to [the originator] but…….. I think that a lot of the people that will benefit do not deserve.


Respondent A replied –

So then the question becomes one of acceptable loss; what percentage of the participants, in your estimation (anyone) must be deserving for the idea to be sound? Forget about the criteria that determine qualification for a moment; that’s a separate issue altogether. If the ratio is 50:50, for instance, do you deny the assistance to one half because the other half doesn’t deserve it, and if not, where is the “break-even” point for you? Bear in mind, you have a time sensitive window – for every day you do nothing, more of the deserving ones fall through the cracks, so assuming the goal is to help someone, the decision has to be made (no deferring to “there has to be a way to make sure everyone is deserving”, because that isn’t practical).


Respondent C added –

There are people within my own family who don’t pay their bills; they don’t pay taxes and the live off the government…still…after 22 years…

Then you have folks who take in 4 teenagers as foster kids to help the above listed people, try to pay bills, and try to make a mortgage payment, and get a whopping $100 per month from the government to assist in food and clothing. Due to this, the house was lost to foreclosure…

Which of these deserves assistance?

You got it! The government decided the first family did.


The Originator the stated –
Yes.

Seriously, why shouldn’t I benefit from making relatively smart decisions? And no, not all people who are being bailed out are guilty of bad decisions but what about the guy in Vegas who made just over $100 grand and bought a $2million house? His payments were more than ½ of his monthly income and he still bought the house and the bank still lent him the money!

Of course, not all are like that. Some were cajoled by their banker/lender to borrow more than they could afford and for that the bank should suffer. But at this time I would say that the whole deal is not just flawed but, well I can’t use that word here but you get the point.

I understand the desire to own something and to “gamble” with adjustable interest rates (OK, that’s a lie. I would never have considered an adjustable rate because the risk is/was/will be too high.) but that is what people did and now we are ALL going to be penalized for it.

I was doing some quick math today and came to the conclusion that the government could give every man, woman and child $1 million and still have plenty to use to bail out all these lenders…that would be paid off with the money that the government just gave them.

And

I understand the need to act but it doesn’t add up. I owe less that $100,000 on my house. If Mr. Obama wanted to bail me out, it would be cheaper to pay off my house. So, the question is really, they are giving how much to bail these people out? The lenders and banks who need help because people are defaulting on loans that they can’t pay because they borrowed too much, for what ever reason.

The way I see it is that if I was one of those in need, they are giving my lender or my lender’s lender double, triple or more than what I owe on my house so that they can then refinance my bad loan and help me get one that is more affordable. So the lenders are the only ones who are coming out ahead.

Am I wrong?


Respondent A then stated –
Well, to be perfectly clear you did benefit from making relatively smart decisions – in many ways – just not this one. The guy in Vegas is an idiot, as was his banker, so if he qualifies that’s a shame. I’m not sure if I would trade punishing his stupidity one-for-one with someone who deserved help, that’s all, and I’m asking what is a fair ratio if this solution is so bad?

Let me clarify: you’re 100% correct that it isn’t fair, and that primarily it benefits lending institutions, not people. That scenario you described where they give the money directly to the people themselves is a surprising concession to socialism, but you’re right – that’s probably the clearest way to inject it into the economy…it’s just completely counter to the way modern capitalism (and certainly conservative economics) functions. A conservative economist will no longer call it “Trickle-Down” theory, but that’s what supply-side econ is: you give the money to the top, and they’re supposed to create jobs, pay it down below them, invest in infrastructure, donate to charity, and all of those things that wealthy people only do if there is a tax
incentive that outweighs offshoring, buying yachts, and taking helicopters to work, LOL. If the money legally had to be spent in this country, it might actually work (a little). I disagree wholeheartedly with bailing out the companies without any plan of recompense to the taxpayer, but again: what’s the alternative? If you distribute the money to the people equally, you’re a communist. If you statize the company when you buy it, you’re a fascist. If you have some criteria where you give the money to the disadvantaged, you’re a socialist.

And even having heard [Respondent C]’s tale prior, it is no less moving; I sympathize for anyone who does the right thing and gets shafted for it, but so long as the argument is centered around fairness rather than justice, that is what a society does. Right now it is unfair that some people will take advantage of a system designed to help those in need, but it is fundamentally unjust to punish those in need in order to prevent that.

The Originator responded –
Point to [Respondent A], as usual

Respondent C then stated –
I absolutely do agree as well. I just don’t think “justice” is determining who gets the assistance. If it was true justice, then I would be completely on board.


So there you have it. I was impressed by the level of intelligence and civility in this discussion. This is an extremely diverse and smart group of people. The Originator is a conservative Catholic, Respondent A is a libertarian, and Respondent C is an evangelical Christian conservative. I’m sure it helps that we have all worked together for years and know each other well, but still if you compare this discussion to most on this issue the difference is notable. Also I’d like to nominate Respondent A for President. He is one of the smartest people that I have ever met. He is pragmatic, thoughtful, and as fair minded as they come (plus he has read at least three large libraries of books ranging from nearly every subject known to man.

Thoughts?